SOXS vs VTI

SOXS vs VTI

Which is better, SOXS or VTI?

Opposite sides of the same exposure.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.71, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSOXSVTI
Expense Ratio1.00%0.03%Best
AUM$1.5B$666.9B
Dividend Yield8.66%1.03%
Holdings123,543
YTD Return-92.31%+12.30%Best
1Y Return-96.02%+16.08%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-87.24%+21.01%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-79.61%+12.36%Best
Volatility (annualized)72.7%14.9%Best
Max Drawdown--35.0%
$10,000 over 5 years$4$17,908Best
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 11, 2010May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 11, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (16.5 years).

SOXS vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16.5 years both funds cover.

SOXS vs VTI Performance

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X ETF (SOXS) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SOXS returned -96.02% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, SOXS is down 92.31% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Over three years, SOXS compounded at -87.24% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -79.61% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.39% annualized vs -70.96%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SOXS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 72.7% compared with 14.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.71. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SOXS charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SOXS currently yields 8.66% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 3 holdings in SOXS and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 94.8% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 3 positions we hold weights for in SOXS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 12 and 3,543.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SOXS and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SOXSVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SOXS or VTI?

SOXS has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $97 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SOXS or VTI?

Over the past year SOXS returned -96.02% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), SOXS annualized -70.96% vs +12.39% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SOXS or VTI?

SOXS has been the more volatile fund at 72.7% annualized versus 14.9% for VTI.

Should I hold both SOXS and VTI?

SOXS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.71, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, SOXS or VTI?

SOXS yields 8.66% while VTI yields 1.03%, so SOXS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than SOXS?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.71, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.