SOXS vs VOO
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SOXS | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.7B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 131.11% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 12 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -92.57% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | -96.77% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -86.88% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -79.83% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 73.0% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 11, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SOXS vs VOO Performance
Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X ETF (SOXS) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SOXS returned -96.77% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, SOXS is down 92.57% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, SOXS compounded at -86.88% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -79.83% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs -71.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SOXS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 73.0% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for SOXS and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.71. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SOXS charges 1.00% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SOXS currently yields 131.11% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SOXS and VOO share 0 holdings out of 509 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SOXS or VOO?
SOXS has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SOXS or VOO?
Over the past year SOXS returned -96.77% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SOXS annualized -71.24% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SOXS or VOO?
SOXS has been the more volatile fund at 73.0% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SOXS -100.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SOXS and VOO?
SOXS and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SOXS and VOO?
SOXS and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 509 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SOXS or VOO?
SOXS yields 131.11% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SOXS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.