SPDW vs VO

SPDW vs VO

Which is better, SPDW or VO?

Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Blend.

SPDW led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VO over the full window. VO is less concentrated, with 9.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 12.6%.

Lower Fees: TiedHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSPDWVO
Expense Ratio0.03%Tie0.03%Tie
AUM$41.1B$107.4B
Dividend Yield2.92%1.30%
Holdings2,440287
YTD Return+12.36%Best+11.92%
1Y Return+20.36%Best+13.54%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.27%Best+17.58%
5Y Return (annualized)+9.48%Best+7.60%
Volatility (annualized)17.5%Best17.7%
Max Drawdown-62.2%-60.3%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$15,728Best$14,423
Top 10 Weight12.6%9.1%Best
Fund FamilySPDR State Street Global AdvisorsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendMid Cap Blend
InceptionApr 20, 2007Jan 26, 2004

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 26, 2007 to Oct 13, 2026 (19.5 years).

SPDW vs VO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.5 years both funds cover.

Compare SPDW against instead:SPDW vs SPYSPDW vs QQQSPDW vs VOOSPDW vs VTIVO against:VO vs VXUS

SPDW vs VO Performance

State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF (SPDW) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (VO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SPDW returned +20.36% while VO returned +13.54%. Year to date, SPDW is up 12.36% versus a gain of 11.92% for VO.

Over three years, SPDW compounded at +20.27% per year against +17.58% for VO; over five years the annualized figures are +9.48% and +7.60% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VO has the edge at +7.94% annualized vs +2.94%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 17.5% for SPDW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.2% for SPDW and -60.3% for VO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SPDW charges 0.03% per year while VO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, SPDW currently yields 2.92% against 1.30% for VO.

Holdings Overlap

SPDW already in VO0.3%
VO already in SPDW0.9%

0.3% of SPDW's money is in holdings VO also owns. 0.9% of VO's money is in holdings SPDW also owns.

We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.

4 positions in common, counted across the 2,395 positions we hold weights for in SPDW and 283 in VO, against full books of 2,440 and 287.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 272 positions for VO that do not appear in our book for SPDW (96.5% of the fund), and 54 for SPDW that do not appear in VO (6.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SPDWWeight in VODifference
WCN:CAWaste Connections Inc Common Stock Cad 00.12%0.41%0.29%
HBANHuntington Bancshares Inc./Oh0.06%0.33%0.27%
EQTEQT Corp.0.05%0.16%0.11%
SYMSymbotic Inc Class A0.02%0.01%0.01%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SPDW and VO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SPDWVO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SPDW or VO?

SPDW has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VO charges 0.03%. At the precision these are quoted to, they cost the same.

Which performed better, SPDW or VO?

Over the past year SPDW returned +20.36% vs +13.54% for VO, so SPDW leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), SPDW annualized +2.94% vs +7.94% for VO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SPDW or VO?

VO has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 17.5% for SPDW. Worst drawdown: SPDW -62.2% vs VO -60.3%.

Should I hold both SPDW and VO?

SPDW and VO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, SPDW or VO?

SPDW yields 2.92% while VO yields 1.30%, so SPDW currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VO better than SPDW?

SPDW led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VO over the full window. VO is less concentrated, with 9.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 12.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.