SPPP vs VTI
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPPP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.01% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $580M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -18.91% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.00% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.67% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -4.61% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Sprott Asset Management LP | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 18, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
SPPP vs VTI Performance
Sprott Physical Platinum and Palladium Trust (SPPP) is a ETF from Sprott Asset Management LP and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SPPP returned +17.00% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, SPPP is down 18.91% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, SPPP compounded at +9.67% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -4.61% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +2.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPPP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.1% for SPPP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPPP charges 1.01% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $101 vs $3 annually, a gap of $98 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPPP currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPPP or VTI?
SPPP has an expense ratio of 1.01% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $98 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SPPP or VTI?
Over the past year SPPP returned +17.00% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), SPPP annualized +2.63% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SPPP or VTI?
SPPP has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SPPP -59.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SPPP and VTI?
SPPP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPPP or VTI?
SPPP yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.