SPY vs TBFG
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust vs The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF
Which is better, SPY or TBFG?
Large Cap Blend against Allocation/Balanced.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. SPY is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPY | TBFG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09%Best | 0.46% |
| AUM | $804.7B | $387M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.98% | 2.36% |
| Holdings | 505 | 25 |
| YTD Return | +11.97%Best | +9.25% |
| 1Y Return | +16.40%Best | +13.73% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.10% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.88% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0% | 9.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -18.8% | -14.2%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.7 years | $16,627Best | $13,793 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.8%Best | 62.9% |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Brinsmere Fund |
| Category | Equity | Allocation/Balanced |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Allocation/Balanced |
| Inception | Jan 22, 1993 | Jan 12, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 16, 2024 to Sep 14, 2026 (2.7 years).
SPY vs TBFG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.7 years both funds cover.
SPY vs TBFG Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and The Brinsmere Fund - Growth ETF (TBFG) is an ETF from Brinsmere Fund. Over the past year SPY returned +16.40% while TBFG returned +13.73%. Year to date, SPY is up 11.97% versus a gain of 9.25% for TBFG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 9.2% for TBFG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for SPY and -14.2% for TBFG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPY charges 0.09% per year while TBFG charges 0.46%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $46 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 0.98% against 2.36% for TBFG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 504 holdings in SPY and 24 in TBFG, totalling 99.9% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 504 positions we hold weights for in SPY and 24 in TBFG, against full books of 505 and 25.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 504 and 24 positions we hold weights for.
SPY holds 497 positions TBFG does not, 99.3% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 8.01%, AAPL 7.26%, MSFT 5.66%, AMZN 3.79%, GOOGL 2.99%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SPY and TBFG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPY or TBFG?
SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while TBFG charges 0.46%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SPY or TBFG?
Over the past year SPY returned +16.40% vs +13.73% for TBFG, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SPY or TBFG?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 9.2% for TBFG. Worst drawdown: SPY -18.8% vs TBFG -14.2%.
Should I hold both SPY and TBFG?
SPY and TBFG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or TBFG?
SPY yields 0.98% while TBFG yields 2.36%, so TBFG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TBFG better than SPY?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. SPY is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 62.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.