SPY vs UAPR
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust vs Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April
Quick Verdict
SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY delivered stronger 1-year returns. SPY offers more diversification with 503 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SPY | UAPR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $789.1B | $157M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.01% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 505 | 8 | |
| YTD Return | +13.39% | +8.43% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.52% | +12.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.36% | +10.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.19% | +6.59% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 6.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.5% | -14.6% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Innovator ETFs Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 22, 1993 | Apr 1, 2019 |
SPY vs UAPR Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year SPY returned +22.52% while UAPR returned +12.35%. Year to date, SPY is up 13.39% versus a gain of 8.43% for UAPR.
Over three years, SPY compounded at +21.36% per year against +10.80% for UAPR; over five years the annualized figures are +13.19% and +6.59% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +8.84% annualized vs +5.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 6.2% for UAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.5% for SPY and -14.6% for UAPR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SPY charges 0.09% per year while UAPR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $79 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 1.01% against 0.00% for UAPR.
Holdings Overlap
SPY and UAPR share 0 holdings out of 504 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SPY or UAPR?
SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while UAPR charges 0.79%. SPY is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $70 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SPY or UAPR?
Over the past year SPY returned +22.52% vs +12.35% for UAPR, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), SPY annualized +8.84% vs +5.10% for UAPR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SPY or UAPR?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 6.2% for UAPR. Worst drawdown: SPY -56.5% vs UAPR -14.6%.
Should I hold both SPY and UAPR?
SPY and UAPR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SPY and UAPR?
SPY and UAPR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 504 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or UAPR?
SPY yields 1.01% while UAPR yields 0.00%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.