UAPR vs VXUS
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UAPR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $157M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +8.43% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.35% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.80% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.59% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -14.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2019 | Jan 26, 2011 |
UAPR vs VXUS Performance
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UAPR returned +12.35% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, UAPR is up 8.43% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, UAPR compounded at +10.80% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +6.59% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, UAPR has the edge at +5.10% annualized vs +4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 6.2% for UAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.6% for UAPR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UAPR charges 0.79% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $5 annually, a gap of $74 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UAPR currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
UAPR and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UAPR or VXUS?
UAPR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $74 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UAPR or VXUS?
Over the past year UAPR returned +12.35% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), UAPR annualized +5.10% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UAPR or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 6.2% for UAPR. Worst drawdown: UAPR -14.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both UAPR and VXUS?
UAPR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between UAPR and VXUS?
UAPR and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UAPR or VXUS?
UAPR yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.