SPY vs ZSB

SPY vs ZSB

Which is better, SPY or ZSB?

Large Cap Blend against Precious Metals.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 3Y and the full window, ZSB over 1Y.

Lower Fees: SPYHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSPYZSB
Expense Ratio0.09%Best0.59%
AUM$804.7B$2M
Dividend Yield0.98%0.88%
Holdings50515
YTD Return+11.45%Best+0.26%
1Y Return+15.87%+38.70%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+20.93%Best+5.40%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.59%-
Volatility (annualized)12.5%Best21.6%
Max Drawdown-18.8%Best-49.3%
$10,000 over 3.7 years$20,115Best$9,085
Fund FamilyState Street Investment ManagementUSCF Investments
CategoryEquityCommodity
StyleLarge Cap BlendPrecious Metals
InceptionJan 22, 1993Jan 10, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 11, 2023 to Sep 15, 2026 (3.7 years).

SPY vs ZSB growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.7 years both funds cover.

SPY vs ZSB Performance

State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management and USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy ETF (ZSB) is an ETF from USCF Investments. Over the past year SPY returned +15.87% while ZSB returned +38.70%. Year to date, SPY is up 11.45% versus a gain of 0.26% for ZSB.

Over three years, SPY compounded at +20.93% per year against +5.40% for ZSB. Across the full 4-year window we track, SPY has the edge at +20.79% annualized vs -2.56%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ZSB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.6% compared with 12.5% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.8% for SPY and -49.3% for ZSB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.09. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SPY charges 0.09% per year while ZSB charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $59 annually, a gap of $50 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SPY currently yields 0.98% against 0.88% for ZSB.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SPY and ZSB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SPYZSB

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SPY or ZSB?

SPY has an expense ratio of 0.09% while ZSB charges 0.59%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $50 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SPY or ZSB?

Over the past year SPY returned +15.87% vs +38.70% for ZSB, so ZSB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), SPY annualized +20.79% vs -2.56% for ZSB. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SPY or ZSB?

ZSB has been the more volatile fund at 21.6% annualized versus 12.5% for SPY. Worst drawdown: SPY -18.8% vs ZSB -49.3%.

Should I hold both SPY and ZSB?

SPY and ZSB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.09, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, SPY or ZSB?

SPY yields 0.98% while ZSB yields 0.88%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZSB better than SPY?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 3Y and the full window, ZSB over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.