SQLT vs VYM

SQLT vs VYM

Which is better, SQLT or VYM?

Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. SQLT is less concentrated, with 8.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: SQLT

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSQLTVYM
Expense Ratio0.20%0.04%Best
AUM$7M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.19%2.22%
Holdings513613
YTD Return+8.80%+10.96%Best
1Y Return-+15.42%
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.78%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.05%
Top 10 Weight8.5%Best26.1%
Fund FamilyiShares by BlackRock (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleSmall Cap BlendLarge Cap Value
InceptionMar 31, 2026Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

SQLT vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

SQLT vs VYM Performance

iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Quality Factor ETF (SQLT) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SQLT is up 8.80% versus a gain of 10.96% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SQLT charges 0.20% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $4 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SQLT currently yields 0.19% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

SQLT already in VYM26.8%
VYM already in SQLT2.4%

26.8% of SQLT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.4% of VYM's money is in holdings SQLT also owns.

SQLT and VYM share little of their money.

101 positions in common, counted across the 488 positions we hold weights for in SQLT and 557 in VYM, against full books of 513 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 432 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for SQLT (94.7% of the fund), and 377 for SQLT that do not appear in VYM (72.0%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SQLTWeight in VYMDifference
NFGNational Fuel Gas Co1.19%0.03%1.16%
EWBCEast West Bancorp, Inc.0.79%0.07%0.72%
JKHYJack Henry & Associates Inc0.67%0.04%0.63%
SEICSei Investments Co.0.64%0.04%0.60%
PRPermian Resource0.58%0.07%0.51%
OVVOvintiv Inc.0.57%0.07%0.50%
FDSFactset Research Systems Inc.0.59%0.04%0.55%
TXRHTexas Roadhouse Inc0.57%0.05%0.52%
EVREvercore, Inc. Class A0.56%0.05%0.51%
OTTROtter Tail Corp.0.54%0.01%0.53%

26.8% of SQLT is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SQLTVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SQLT or VYM?

SQLT has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $16 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between SQLT and VYM?

26.8% of SQLT's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 2.4% of VYM's is in holdings SQLT also owns. They hold 101 positions in common, counted across the 488 positions we hold weights for in SQLT and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, SQLT or VYM?

SQLT yields 0.19% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than SQLT?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. SQLT is less concentrated, with 8.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.