SRLN vs VXUS
SRLN vs VXUS
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRLN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $5.3B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.50% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 607 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +1.41% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.33% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.18% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.79% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -28.4% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 3, 2013 | Jan 26, 2011 |
SRLN vs VXUS Performance
State Street Blackstone Senior Loan ETF (SRLN) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRLN returned +4.33% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, SRLN is up 1.41% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, SRLN compounded at +7.18% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +4.79% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +1.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 5.2% for SRLN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -28.4% for SRLN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRLN charges 0.70% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $5 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRLN currently yields 7.50% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
SRLN and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7887 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRLN or VXUS?
SRLN has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SRLN or VXUS?
Over the past year SRLN returned +4.33% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), SRLN annualized +1.24% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SRLN or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 5.2% for SRLN. Worst drawdown: SRLN -28.4% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SRLN and VXUS?
SRLN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SRLN and VXUS?
SRLN and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7887 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRLN or VXUS?
SRLN yields 7.50% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so SRLN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.