TAGS vs VTI
Teucrium Agricultural Fund ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TAGS | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.00% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $20M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.19% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.05% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -4.17% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +0.58% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -76.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Teucrium | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 28, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
TAGS vs VTI Performance
Teucrium Agricultural Fund ETF (TAGS) is a ETF from Teucrium and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TAGS returned +13.05% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, TAGS is up 18.19% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, TAGS compounded at -4.17% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +0.58% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs -4.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TAGS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -76.4% for TAGS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.09. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TAGS charges 1.00% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $3 annually, a gap of $97 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TAGS currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
TAGS and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2791 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TAGS or VTI?
TAGS has an expense ratio of 1.00% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $97 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TAGS or VTI?
Over the past year TAGS returned +13.05% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), TAGS annualized -4.17% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TAGS or VTI?
TAGS has been the more volatile fund at 15.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TAGS -76.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TAGS and VTI?
TAGS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.09, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TAGS and VTI?
TAGS and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2791 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TAGS or VTI?
TAGS yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.