TARK vs VOO

TARK vs VOO

Which is better, TARK or VOO?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. TARK led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTARKVOO
Expense Ratio1.48%0.03%Best
AUM$20M$997.4B
Dividend Yield28.11%1.04%
Holdings10509
YTD Return+14.88%Best+14.14%
1Y Return-7.77%+17.31%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+39.40%Best+23.16%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.85%
Volatility (annualized)85.2%15.2%Best
Max Drawdown-77.8%-18.7%Best
$10,000 over 4.4 years$9,365$19,908Best
Fund FamilyTradr ETFsVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 28, 2022Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 2, 2022 to Sep 21, 2026 (4.4 years).

TARK vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.4 years both funds cover.

TARK vs VOO Performance

Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF (TARK) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TARK returned -7.77% while VOO returned +17.31%. Year to date, TARK is up 14.88% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.

Over three years, TARK compounded at +39.40% per year against +23.16% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +16.94% annualized vs -1.48%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TARK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 85.2% compared with 15.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.8% for TARK and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TARK charges 1.48% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $148 vs $3 annually, a gap of $145 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TARK currently yields 28.11% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of TARK and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

TARKVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TARK or VOO?

TARK has an expense ratio of 1.48% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $145 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, TARK or VOO?

Over the past year TARK returned -7.77% vs +17.31% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TARK annualized -1.48% vs +16.94% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, TARK or VOO?

TARK has been the more volatile fund at 85.2% annualized versus 15.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: TARK -77.8% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both TARK and VOO?

TARK and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, TARK or VOO?

TARK yields 28.11% while VOO yields 1.04%, so TARK currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than TARK?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. TARK led over 3Y, VOO over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.