TLTW vs VXUS
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TLTW | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $1.9B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.59% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 4 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -6.27% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | -3.08% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -0.65% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -18.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 18, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
TLTW vs VXUS Performance
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TLTW returned -3.08% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, TLTW is down 6.27% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, TLTW compounded at -0.65% per year against +19.53% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs -2.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 12.1% for TLTW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.6% for TLTW and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TLTW charges 0.35% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $5 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TLTW currently yields 11.59% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
TLTW and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7863 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TLTW or VXUS?
TLTW has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TLTW or VXUS?
Over the past year TLTW returned -3.08% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), TLTW annualized -2.45% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TLTW or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 12.1% for TLTW. Worst drawdown: TLTW -18.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both TLTW and VXUS?
TLTW and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TLTW and VXUS?
TLTW and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7863 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TLTW or VXUS?
TLTW yields 11.59% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so TLTW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.