TTT vs VTI
ProShares UltraPro Short 20 Year Treasury vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TTT | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $18M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 9.68% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.46% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.73% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.50% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +23.50% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -94.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
TTT vs VTI Performance
ProShares UltraPro Short 20 Year Treasury (TTT) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TTT returned +12.73% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, TTT is up 13.46% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, TTT compounded at +4.50% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +23.50% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs -9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TTT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.0% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.1% for TTT and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TTT charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TTT currently yields 9.68% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
TTT and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TTT or VTI?
TTT has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TTT or VTI?
Over the past year TTT returned +12.73% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), TTT annualized -9.46% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TTT or VTI?
TTT has been the more volatile fund at 39.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TTT -94.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TTT and VTI?
TTT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TTT and VTI?
TTT and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TTT or VTI?
TTT yields 9.68% while VTI yields 1.07%, so TTT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.