TTT vs VYM
ProShares UltraPro Short 20 Year Treasury vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TTT | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $18M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 9.68% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 10 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +15.02% | +16.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.09% | +26.05% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.99% | +18.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +22.82% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -94.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2012 | Nov 10, 2006 |
TTT vs VYM Performance
ProShares UltraPro Short 20 Year Treasury (TTT) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TTT returned +13.09% while VYM returned +26.05%. Year to date, TTT is up 15.02% versus a gain of 16.16% for VYM.
Over three years, TTT compounded at +4.99% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +22.82% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.09% annualized vs -9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TTT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -94.1% for TTT and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TTT charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TTT currently yields 9.68% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
TTT and VYM share 0 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TTT or VYM?
TTT has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TTT or VYM?
Over the past year TTT returned +13.09% vs +26.05% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), TTT annualized -9.38% vs +7.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TTT or VYM?
TTT has been the more volatile fund at 39.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: TTT -94.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both TTT and VYM?
TTT and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TTT and VYM?
TTT and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TTT or VYM?
TTT yields 9.68% while VYM yields 2.86%, so TTT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.