UBT vs VXUS
ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UBT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $59M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.44% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 8 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -9.16% | +15.00% | |
| 1Y Return | -7.36% | +26.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -8.53% | +19.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -20.79% | +9.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -79.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 19, 2010 | Jan 26, 2011 |
UBT vs VXUS Performance
ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury (UBT) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UBT returned -7.36% while VXUS returned +26.87%. Year to date, UBT is down 9.16% versus a gain of 15.00% for VXUS.
Over three years, UBT compounded at -8.53% per year against +19.79% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -20.79% and +9.26% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.88% annualized vs -0.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UBT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.3% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.0% for UBT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UBT charges 0.95% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $5 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UBT currently yields 3.44% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
UBT and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7862 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UBT or VXUS?
UBT has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UBT or VXUS?
Over the past year UBT returned -7.36% vs +26.87% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), UBT annualized -0.49% vs +4.88% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UBT or VXUS?
UBT has been the more volatile fund at 27.3% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: UBT -79.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both UBT and VXUS?
UBT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between UBT and VXUS?
UBT and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7862 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UBT or VXUS?
UBT yields 3.44% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so UBT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.