UFIV vs VYM

UFIV vs VYM

Which is better, UFIV or VYM?

Long Term High Quality against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUFIVVYM
Expense Ratio0.15%0.04%Best
AUM$30M$81.6B
Dividend Yield3.93%2.22%
Holdings2613
YTD Return-1.79%+13.15%Best
1Y Return-1.36%+17.82%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+3.57%+17.99%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.16%
Volatility (annualized)4.1%Best11.3%
Max Drawdown-5.6%Best-14.5%
$10,000 over 3.5 years$10,892$17,366Best
Fund FamilyUS Benchmark SeriesVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleLong Term High QualityLarge Cap Value
InceptionMar 28, 2023Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 28, 2023 to Sep 10, 2026 (3.5 years).

UFIV vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.

UFIV vs VYM Performance

F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) is an ETF from US Benchmark Series and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UFIV returned -1.36% while VYM returned +17.82%. Year to date, UFIV is down 1.79% versus a gain of 13.15% for VYM.

Over three years, UFIV compounded at +3.57% per year against +17.99% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +17.08% annualized vs +2.47%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.3% compared with 4.1% for UFIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.6% for UFIV and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UFIV charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UFIV currently yields 3.93% against 2.22% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of UFIV and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

UFIVVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UFIV or VYM?

UFIV has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, UFIV or VYM?

Over the past year UFIV returned -1.36% vs +17.82% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), UFIV annualized +2.47% vs +17.08% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, UFIV or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 11.3% annualized versus 4.1% for UFIV. Worst drawdown: UFIV -5.6% vs VYM -14.5%.

Should I hold both UFIV and VYM?

UFIV and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, UFIV or VYM?

UFIV yields 3.93% while VYM yields 2.22%, so UFIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than UFIV?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.