UFIV vs VOO

UFIV vs VOO

Which is better, UFIV or VOO?

Long Term High Quality against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUFIVVOO
Expense Ratio0.15%0.03%Best
AUM$30M$997.4B
Dividend Yield3.93%1.04%
Holdings2509
YTD Return-1.79%+11.55%Best
1Y Return-1.36%+17.54%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+3.57%+20.71%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.80%
Volatility (annualized)4.1%Best12.5%
Max Drawdown-5.6%Best-18.7%
$10,000 over 3.5 years$10,892$20,189Best
Fund FamilyUS Benchmark SeriesVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleLong Term High QualityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 28, 2023Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 28, 2023 to Sep 10, 2026 (3.5 years).

UFIV vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.

UFIV vs VOO Performance

F/m US Treasury 5 Year Note ETF (UFIV) is an ETF from US Benchmark Series and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UFIV returned -1.36% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, UFIV is down 1.79% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.

Over three years, UFIV compounded at +3.57% per year against +20.71% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +22.23% annualized vs +2.47%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.5% compared with 4.1% for UFIV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.6% for UFIV and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UFIV charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UFIV currently yields 3.93% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of UFIV and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

UFIVVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UFIV or VOO?

UFIV has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, UFIV or VOO?

Over the past year UFIV returned -1.36% vs +17.54% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), UFIV annualized +2.47% vs +22.23% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, UFIV or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.5% annualized versus 4.1% for UFIV. Worst drawdown: UFIV -5.6% vs VOO -18.7%.

Should I hold both UFIV and VOO?

UFIV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, UFIV or VOO?

UFIV yields 3.93% while VOO yields 1.04%, so UFIV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than UFIV?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.