UMAR vs VYM
UMAR vs VYM
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UMAR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $194M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +7.31% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.60% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.45% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.92% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 6.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.1% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 28, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
UMAR vs VYM Performance
Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - March (UMAR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UMAR returned +12.60% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, UMAR is up 7.31% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, UMAR compounded at +12.45% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.92% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, UMAR has the edge at +7.83% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 6.0% for UMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.1% for UMAR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UMAR charges 0.79% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $4 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UMAR currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
UMAR and VYM share 0 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UMAR or VYM?
UMAR has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, UMAR or VYM?
Over the past year UMAR returned +12.60% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), UMAR annualized +7.83% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, UMAR or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 6.0% for UMAR. Worst drawdown: UMAR -11.1% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both UMAR and VYM?
UMAR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between UMAR and VYM?
UMAR and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, UMAR or VYM?
UMAR yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.