URAN vs VTI
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, URAN or VTI?
Energy against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | URAN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $29M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.69% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 32 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -18.93% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | -19.64% | +18.17%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.04% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.14% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.5% | 12.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -35.2% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $13,426 | $13,755Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 66.4% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Commodity | Equity |
| Style | Energy | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 24, 2024 to Sep 25, 2026 (2 years).
URAN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
URAN vs VTI Performance
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) is an ETF from Themes ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year URAN returned -19.64% while VTI returned +18.17%. Year to date, URAN is down 18.93% versus a gain of 13.60% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.5% compared with 12.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.2% for URAN and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
URAN charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, URAN currently yields 2.69% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
21.5% of URAN's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
URAN and VTI share little of their money.
6 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in URAN and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 32 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,148 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for URAN (97.4% of the fund), and 1 for URAN that do not appear in VTI (1.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
21.5% of URAN is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, URAN or VTI?
URAN has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, URAN or VTI?
Over the past year URAN returned -19.64% vs +18.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), URAN annualized +15.87% vs +17.28% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, URAN or VTI?
URAN has been the more volatile fund at 39.5% annualized versus 12.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: URAN -35.2% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both URAN and VTI?
URAN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between URAN and VTI?
21.5% of URAN's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.0% of VTI's is in holdings URAN also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in URAN and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, URAN or VTI?
URAN yields 2.69% while VTI yields 1.03%, so URAN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than URAN?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 66.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.