URAN vs VTI
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | URAN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $32M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.92% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 48 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -13.10% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.57% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 39.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -35.2% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Commodity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
URAN vs VTI Performance
Themes Uranium & Nuclear ETF (URAN) is a ETF from Themes ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year URAN returned +8.57% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, URAN is down 13.10% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
URAN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.2% for URAN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
URAN charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, URAN currently yields 2.92% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
URAN and VTI share 6 holdings out of 2807 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, URAN or VTI?
URAN has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, URAN or VTI?
Over the past year URAN returned +8.57% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), URAN annualized +21.09% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, URAN or VTI?
URAN has been the more volatile fund at 39.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: URAN -35.2% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both URAN and VTI?
URAN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between URAN and VTI?
URAN and VTI share 6 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2807 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, URAN or VTI?
URAN yields 2.92% while VTI yields 1.07%, so URAN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.