UXAP vs VTI

UXAP vs VTI

Which is better, UXAP or VTI?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. UXAP led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUXAPVTI
Expense Ratio0.85%0.03%Best
AUM$11M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings83,543
YTD Return+12.13%+12.30%Best
1Y Return+15.76%+16.08%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.01%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.36%
Volatility (annualized)13.9%12.1%Best
Max Drawdown-10.4%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1.4 years$15,168Best$15,037
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 17, 2025May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 21, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1.4 years).

UXAP vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.

UXAP vs VTI Performance

FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UXAP returned +15.76% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, UXAP is up 12.13% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UXAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.9% compared with 12.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.4% for UXAP and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UXAP charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UXAP currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of UXAP and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

UXAPVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UXAP or VTI?

UXAP has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, UXAP or VTI?

Over the past year UXAP returned +15.76% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), UXAP annualized +34.66% vs +33.83% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, UXAP or VTI?

UXAP has been the more volatile fund at 13.9% annualized versus 12.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: UXAP -10.4% vs VTI -8.9%.

Should I hold both UXAP and VTI?

UXAP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, UXAP or VTI?

UXAP yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than UXAP?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. UXAP led over the full window, VTI over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.