UXAP vs VYM
FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, UXAP or VYM?
Option Writing against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. UXAP led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | UXAP | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $11M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 8 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +14.17%Best | +11.47% |
| 1Y Return | +16.63%Best | +15.94% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.03% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.7% | 9.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.4% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $15,404Best | $13,800 |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 17, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 21, 2025 to Sep 21, 2026 (1.4 years).
UXAP vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
UXAP vs VYM Performance
FT Vest US Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - April (UXAP) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UXAP returned +16.63% while VYM returned +15.94%. Year to date, UXAP is up 14.17% versus a gain of 11.47% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
UXAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.7% compared with 9.2% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.4% for UXAP and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
UXAP charges 0.85% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $4 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UXAP currently yields 0.00% against 2.22% for VYM.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of UXAP and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, UXAP or VYM?
UXAP has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $81 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, UXAP or VYM?
Over the past year UXAP returned +16.63% vs +15.94% for VYM, so UXAP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), UXAP annualized +36.15% vs +25.87% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, UXAP or VYM?
UXAP has been the more volatile fund at 13.7% annualized versus 9.2% for VYM. Worst drawdown: UXAP -10.4% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both UXAP and VYM?
UXAP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, UXAP or VYM?
UXAP yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than UXAP?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. UXAP led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.