VEFA vs VOO
VanEck MSCI EAFE Analyst Sentiment ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, VEFA or VOO?
VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VEFA is less concentrated, with 23.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VEFA | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.74% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 101 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +15.97%Best | +12.25% |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.03% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.25% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.08% |
| Top 10 Weight | 23.3%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 1, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
VEFA vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VEFA vs VOO Performance
VanEck MSCI EAFE Analyst Sentiment ETF (VEFA) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, VEFA is up 15.97% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VEFA charges 0.30% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $3 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VEFA currently yields 0.74% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 100 holdings in VEFA and 494 in VOO, totalling 99.7% and 99.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in VEFA and 494 in VOO, against full books of 101 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 487 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for VEFA (99.2% of the fund), and 1 for VEFA that do not appear in VOO (0.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VEFA and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VEFA or VOO?
VEFA has an expense ratio of 0.30% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, VEFA or VOO?
VEFA yields 0.74% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than VEFA?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VEFA is less concentrated, with 23.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.