VETZ vs VYM
Academy Veteran Bond ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VETZ | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $125M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 6.15% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 146 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +0.25% | +15.34% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.07% | +23.24% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.33% | +19.22% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 5.5% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -5.2% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Academy Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 1, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
VETZ vs VYM Performance
Academy Veteran Bond ETF (VETZ) is a ETF from Academy Asset Management and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VETZ returned +4.07% while VYM returned +23.24%. Year to date, VETZ is up 0.25% versus a gain of 15.34% for VYM.
Over three years, VETZ compounded at +5.33% per year against +19.22% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +4.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 5.5% for VETZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -5.2% for VETZ and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VETZ charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VETZ currently yields 6.15% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
VETZ and VYM share 0 holdings out of 611 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VETZ or VYM?
VETZ has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VETZ or VYM?
Over the past year VETZ returned +4.07% vs +23.24% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), VETZ annualized +4.67% vs +7.04% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VETZ or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 5.5% for VETZ. Worst drawdown: VETZ -5.2% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both VETZ and VYM?
VETZ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VETZ and VYM?
VETZ and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 611 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VETZ or VYM?
VETZ yields 6.15% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VETZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.