VGK vs VOT
Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF
Which is better, VGK or VOT?
Large Cap Blend against Mid Cap Growth.
VOT has a lower expense ratio. VGK led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VOT over the full window. VGK is less concentrated, with 18.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 20.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VGK | VOT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.06% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $38.5B | $19.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.81% | 0.60% |
| Holdings | 1,240 | 129 |
| YTD Return | +7.47%Best | +6.16% |
| 1Y Return | +15.45%Best | +1.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.54%Best | +16.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.34%Best | +4.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.0% | 18.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -67.3% | -60.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $15,628Best | $12,678 |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.4%Best | 20.9% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Mid Cap Growth |
| Inception | Mar 4, 2005 | Aug 17, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 24, 2006 to Sep 21, 2026 (20.1 years).
VGK vs VOT growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.1 years both funds cover.
VGK vs VOT Performance
Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF (VGK) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VGK returned +15.45% while VOT returned +1.82%. Year to date, VGK is up 7.47% versus a gain of 6.16% for VOT.
Over three years, VGK compounded at +18.54% per year against +16.18% for VOT; over five years the annualized figures are +9.34% and +4.86% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VOT has the edge at +9.40% annualized vs +2.79%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VGK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.0% compared with 18.5% for VOT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.3% for VGK and -60.3% for VOT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VGK charges 0.06% per year while VOT charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $5 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VGK currently yields 2.81% against 0.60% for VOT.
Holdings Overlap
0.9% of VGK's money is in holdings VOT also owns. 0.7% of VOT's money is in holdings VGK also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
2 positions in common, counted across the 1,101 positions we hold weights for in VGK and 123 in VOT, against full books of 1,240 and 129.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 117 positions for VOT that do not appear in our book for VGK (97.4% of the fund), and 11 for VGK that do not appear in VOT (2.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VGK and VOT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VGK or VOT?
VGK has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VOT charges 0.05%. VOT is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VGK or VOT?
Over the past year VGK returned +15.45% vs +1.82% for VOT, so VGK leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), VGK annualized +2.79% vs +9.40% for VOT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VGK or VOT?
VGK has been the more volatile fund at 19.0% annualized versus 18.5% for VOT. Worst drawdown: VGK -67.3% vs VOT -60.3%.
Should I hold both VGK and VOT?
VGK and VOT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, VGK or VOT?
VGK yields 2.81% while VOT yields 0.60%, so VGK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOT better than VGK?
VOT has a lower expense ratio. VGK led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VOT over the full window. VGK is less concentrated, with 18.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 20.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.