VGK vs VTI

VGK vs VTI

Which is better, VGK or VTI?

VTI has been ahead.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VGK is less concentrated, with 18.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTILess Concentrated: VGK

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVGKVTI
Expense Ratio0.06%0.03%Best
AUM$31.0B$690.1B
Dividend Yield2.81%1.03%
Holdings1,2503,524
YTD Return+3.21%+12.51%Best
1Y Return+9.14%+15.23%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+18.12%+22.50%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+8.78%+12.31%Best
Volatility (annualized)18.5%15.3%Best
Max Drawdown-67.3%-56.6%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$15,232$17,869Best
Top 10 Weight18.4%Best33.3%
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 4, 2005May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 10, 2005 to Oct 1, 2026 (21.6 years).

VGK vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 21.6 years both funds cover.

VGK vs VTI Performance

Vanguard FTSE Europe ETF (VGK) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VGK returned +9.14% while VTI returned +15.23%. Year to date, VGK is up 3.21% versus a gain of 12.51% for VTI.

Over three years, VGK compounded at +18.12% per year against +22.50% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.78% and +12.31% respectively. Across the full 22-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.37% annualized vs +3.31%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VGK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.3% for VGK and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VGK charges 0.06% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $6 vs $3 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VGK currently yields 2.81% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

VGK already in VTI1.2%
VTI already in VGK0.1%

1.2% of VGK's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings VGK also owns.

VGK and VTI share little of their money.

9 positions in common, counted across the 1,101 positions we hold weights for in VGK and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 1,250 and 3,524.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,147 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for VGK (97.3% of the fund), and 5 for VGK that do not appear in VTI (1.9%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VGKWeight in VTIDifference
CURVVanguard Market Liquidity Fund0.71%0.00%0.71%
SUNBSunbelt Rentals0.18%0.04%0.14%
HBANHuntington Bancshares Inc./Oh0.13%0.05%0.08%
FBKFb Financial Corp0.10%0.00%0.10%
AMAntero Midstream Corporationam0.03%0.01%0.02%
CCCSCcc Intelligent Solutions Hold0.02%0.00%0.02%
MDVModiv Inc0.01%0.00%0.01%
SMGScotts Miracle-Gro Company0.00%0.00%0.00%
CASHMeta Financial Group Inc0.00%0.00%0.00%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of VGK and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

VGKVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VGK or VTI?

VGK has an expense ratio of 0.06% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, VGK or VTI?

Over the past year VGK returned +9.14% vs +15.23% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (22 years), VGK annualized +3.31% vs +9.37% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, VGK or VTI?

VGK has been the more volatile fund at 18.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VGK -67.3% vs VTI -56.6%.

Should I hold both VGK and VTI?

VGK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between VGK and VTI?

1.2% of VGK's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's is in holdings VGK also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 1,101 positions we hold weights for in VGK and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, VGK or VTI?

VGK yields 2.81% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VGK currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than VGK?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VGK is less concentrated, with 18.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.