VOT vs VXF
Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Extended Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VXF delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXF offers more diversification with 3,376 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOT | VXF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $19.1B | $30.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.62% | 1.03% | |
| Holdings | 129 | 3,376 | |
| YTD Return | +8.10% | +15.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +7.24% | +23.93% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.85% | +19.90% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.42% | +7.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.5% | 18.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -60.3% | -59.4% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 17, 2006 | Dec 27, 2001 |
VOT vs VXF Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Extended Market ETF (VXF) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VOT returned +7.24% while VXF returned +23.93%. Year to date, VOT is up 8.10% versus a gain of 15.71% for VXF.
Over three years, VOT compounded at +15.85% per year against +19.90% for VXF; over five years the annualized figures are +5.42% and +7.18% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VOT has the edge at +9.54% annualized vs +9.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 18.5% for VOT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -60.3% for VOT and -59.4% for VXF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOT charges 0.05% per year while VXF charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $5 annually. On income, VOT currently yields 0.62% against 1.03% for VXF.
Holdings Overlap
VOT and VXF share 25 holdings out of 3390 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOT or VXF?
VOT has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VXF charges 0.05%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOT or VXF?
Over the past year VOT returned +7.24% vs +23.93% for VXF, so VXF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), VOT annualized +9.54% vs +9.01% for VXF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOT or VXF?
VXF has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 18.5% for VOT. Worst drawdown: VOT -60.3% vs VXF -59.4%.
Should I hold both VOT and VXF?
VOT and VXF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VOT and VXF?
VOT and VXF share 25 common holdings with a 8.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3390 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOT or VXF?
VOT yields 0.62% while VXF yields 1.03%, so VXF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.