VTI vs WTMF
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF vs WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WTMF | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.66% | |
| AUM | $663.5B | $243M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 2.84% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 30 | |
| YTD Return | +14.22% | +8.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.19% | +17.60% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27% | +10.05% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.23% | +6.29% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 6.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -30.8% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | WisdomTree Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Jan 5, 2011 |
VTI vs WTMF Performance
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year VTI returned +22.19% while WTMF returned +17.60%. Year to date, VTI is up 14.22% versus a gain of 8.64% for WTMF.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.27% per year against +10.05% for WTMF; over five years the annualized figures are +12.23% and +6.29% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +1.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 6.4% for WTMF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -30.8% for WTMF. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WTMF charges 0.66%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $66 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 2.84% for WTMF.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and WTMF share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WTMF?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WTMF charges 0.66%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or WTMF?
Over the past year VTI returned +22.19% vs +17.60% for WTMF, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VTI annualized +8.14% vs +1.16% for WTMF. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or WTMF?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 6.4% for WTMF. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs WTMF -30.8%.
Should I hold both VTI and WTMF?
VTI and WTMF have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WTMF?
VTI and WTMF share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WTMF?
VTI yields 1.07% while WTMF yields 2.84%, so WTMF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.