VTI vs WULX
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF
Which is better, VTI or WULX?
Large Cap Blend against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WULX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 1.30% |
| AUM | $689.2B | $21M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 3,542 | 8 |
| YTD Return | +12.23%Best | -56.49% |
| 1Y Return | +12.74%Best | -60.98% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.44% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.83% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.6%Best | 157.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -92.3% |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $11,507Best | $3,150 |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Tradr ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Oct 22, 2025 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 23, 2025 to Nov 11, 2026 (1.1 years).
VTI vs WULX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
VTI vs WULX Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Tradr 2X Long WULF Daily ETF (WULX) is an ETF from Tradr ETFs. Over the past year VTI returned +12.74% while WULX returned -60.98%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.23% versus a loss of 56.49% for WULX.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WULX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 157.5% compared with 12.6% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for VTI and -92.3% for WULX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WULX charges 1.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $130 annually, a gap of $127 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for WULX.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VTI and WULX you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WULX?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WULX charges 1.30%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $127 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or WULX?
Over the past year VTI returned +12.74% vs -60.98% for WULX, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), VTI annualized +13.61% vs -65.01% for WULX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or WULX?
WULX has been the more volatile fund at 157.5% annualized versus 12.6% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -8.9% vs WULX -92.3%.
Should I hold both VTI and WULX?
VTI and WULX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WULX?
VTI yields 1.06% while WULX yields 0.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is WULX better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.