VTI vs XAPR
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XAPR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $30M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +14.82% | +5.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.43% | +8.11% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.93% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.34% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4% | 2.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -6.2% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Apr 19, 2024 |
VTI vs XAPR Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - April (XAPR) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year VTI returned +22.43% while XAPR returned +8.11%. Year to date, VTI is up 14.82% versus a gain of 5.29% for XAPR.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 2.5% for XAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -6.2% for XAPR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XAPR charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 0.00% for XAPR.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and XAPR share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XAPR?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XAPR charges 0.85%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or XAPR?
Over the past year VTI returned +22.43% vs +8.11% for XAPR, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), VTI annualized +8.16% vs +11.41% for XAPR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or XAPR?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 2.5% for XAPR. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs XAPR -6.2%.
Should I hold both VTI and XAPR?
VTI and XAPR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and XAPR?
VTI and XAPR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XAPR?
VTI yields 1.07% while XAPR yields 0.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.