VTI vs XBAP
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XBAP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $131M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 9 | |
| YTD Return | +13.14% | +10.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.35% | +14.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.83% | +13.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.01% | +9.74% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 8.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -14.6% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Innovator ETFs Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Mar 31, 2021 |
VTI vs XBAP Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% while XBAP returned +14.31%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.14% versus a gain of 10.23% for XBAP.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.83% per year against +13.83% for XBAP; over five years the annualized figures are +12.01% and +9.74% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, XBAP has the edge at +9.97% annualized vs +8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 8.7% for XBAP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -14.6% for XBAP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XBAP charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 0.00% for XBAP.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and XBAP share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XBAP?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XBAP charges 0.79%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or XBAP?
Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% vs +14.31% for XBAP, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VTI annualized +8.09% vs +9.97% for XBAP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or XBAP?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 8.7% for XBAP. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs XBAP -14.6%.
Should I hold both VTI and XBAP?
VTI and XBAP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and XBAP?
VTI and XBAP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XBAP?
VTI yields 1.07% while XBAP yields 0.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.