VTI vs XPP
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF vs ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XPP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.95% | |
| AUM | $663.5B | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 3.19% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 7 | |
| YTD Return | +13.87% | -23.40% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.31% | -14.45% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.17% | +7.10% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.23% | -16.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 47.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -90.5% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | ProShares | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Jun 4, 2009 |
VTI vs XPP Performance
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and ProShares Ultra FTSE China 50 (XPP) is a ETF from ProShares. Over the past year VTI returned +23.31% while XPP returned -14.45%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.87% versus a loss of 23.40% for XPP.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.17% per year against +7.10% for XPP; over five years the annualized figures are +12.23% and -16.54% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs -5.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XPP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 47.0% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -90.5% for XPP. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.41. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XPP charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $95 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 3.19% for XPP.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and XPP share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XPP?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XPP charges 0.95%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or XPP?
Over the past year VTI returned +23.31% vs -14.45% for XPP, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), VTI annualized +8.13% vs -5.39% for XPP. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or XPP?
XPP has been the more volatile fund at 47.0% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs XPP -90.5%.
Should I hold both VTI and XPP?
VTI and XPP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.41, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and XPP?
VTI and XPP share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XPP?
VTI yields 1.07% while XPP yields 3.19%, so XPP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.