VTI vs XSOE
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets Ex-State Owned Enterprises Fund
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. XSOE delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XSOE | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.33% | |
| AUM | $663.5B | $2.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 827 | |
| YTD Return | +13.87% | +17.59% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.31% | +35.29% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.17% | +20.35% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.23% | +5.16% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 18.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -45.2% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | WisdomTree Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Dec 10, 2014 |
VTI vs XSOE Performance
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Ex-State Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) is a ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year VTI returned +23.31% while XSOE returned +35.29%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.87% versus a gain of 17.59% for XSOE.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.17% per year against +20.35% for XSOE; over five years the annualized figures are +12.23% and +5.16% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs +6.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XSOE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -45.2% for XSOE. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XSOE charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $33 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 1.08% for XSOE.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and XSOE share 1 holdings out of 3515 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in XSOE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| RS | 0.03% | 0.08% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XSOE?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XSOE charges 0.33%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or XSOE?
Over the past year VTI returned +23.31% vs +35.29% for XSOE, so XSOE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), VTI annualized +8.13% vs +6.51% for XSOE. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or XSOE?
XSOE has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs XSOE -45.2%.
Should I hold both VTI and XSOE?
VTI and XSOE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and XSOE?
VTI and XSOE share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 3515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XSOE?
VTI yields 1.07% while XSOE yields 1.08%, so XSOE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.