VTI vs XSOE
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets Ex-State Owned Enterprises Fund
Which is better, VTI or XSOE?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 5Y and the full window, XSOE over 1Y and 3Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XSOE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.32% |
| AUM | $666.9B | $2.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.03% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 827 |
| YTD Return | +12.43% | +18.70%Best |
| 1Y Return | +15.92% | +26.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.42% | +22.70%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.37%Best | +6.33% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.4%Best | 18.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -35.0%Best | -45.2% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,916Best | $13,592 |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.3%Best | 35.2% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Dec 10, 2014 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 10, 2014 to Sep 28, 2026 (11.8 years).
VTI vs XSOE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.8 years both funds cover.
VTI vs XSOE Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Ex-State Owned Enterprises Fund (XSOE) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year VTI returned +15.92% while XSOE returned +26.22%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.43% versus a gain of 18.70% for XSOE.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +22.42% per year against +22.70% for XSOE; over five years the annualized figures are +12.37% and +6.33% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.18% annualized vs +6.52%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XSOE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -35.0% for VTI and -45.2% for XSOE. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XSOE charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $32 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.03% against 1.10% for XSOE.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 3,463 holdings in VTI and 819 in XSOE, totalling 98.1% and 99.0% of the two funds. That is not enough of XSOE to divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 3,463 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 819 in XSOE, against full books of 3,543 and 827.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 23 positions for XSOE that do not appear in our book for VTI (2.5% of the fund), and 1,150 for VTI that do not appear in XSOE (97.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in XSOE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| EGYMalco Energy Ltd | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VTI and XSOE you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XSOE?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XSOE charges 0.32%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VTI or XSOE?
Over the past year VTI returned +15.92% vs +26.22% for XSOE, so XSOE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), VTI annualized +12.18% vs +6.52% for XSOE. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VTI or XSOE?
XSOE has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VTI -35.0% vs XSOE -45.2%.
Should I hold both VTI and XSOE?
VTI and XSOE have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XSOE?
VTI yields 1.03% while XSOE yields 1.10%, so XSOE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XSOE better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 5Y and the full window, XSOE over 1Y and 3Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 35.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.