VTI vs XVAD
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs FT Vest AMD & Target Income ETF
Which is better, VTI or XVAD?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | XVAD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.85% |
| AUM | $689.2B | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 1.29% |
| Holdings | 3,542 | 18 |
| YTD Return | +12.23%Best | -10.63% |
| 1Y Return | +12.74% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.44% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.83% | - |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | - |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Sep 22, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
VTI vs XVAD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VTI vs XVAD Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and FT Vest AMD & Target Income ETF (XVAD) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Year to date, VTI is up 12.23% versus a loss of 10.63% for XVAD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while XVAD charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.06% against 1.29% for XVAD.
Holdings Overlap
At least 1.4% of VTI's money is in holdings XVAD also owns.
Stated as a floor: for XVAD, our book for it covers 50.3% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
VTI and XVAD share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 3,464 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 1 in XVAD, against full books of 3,542 and 18.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VTI | Weight in XVAD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.36% | 50.28% | 48.92% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of VTI and XVAD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or XVAD?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XVAD charges 0.85%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and XVAD?
At least 1.4% of VTI's money is in holdings XVAD also owns. Our book for XVAD is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 3,464 positions we hold weights for in VTI and 1 in XVAD.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or XVAD?
VTI yields 1.06% while XVAD yields 1.29%, so XVAD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is XVAD better than VTI?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.