VXUS vs WQTM

VXUS vs WQTM

Which is better, VXUS or WQTM?

Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VXUSHigher Returns (1Y): VXUS

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVXUSWQTM
Expense Ratio0.05%Best0.45%
AUM$158.1B$333M
Dividend Yield2.51%0.00%
Holdings8,74747
YTD Return+14.48%+19.33%Best
1Y Return+22.28%Best+5.48%
3Y Return (annualized)+20.00%-
5Y Return (annualized)+8.91%-
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)WisdomTree Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Growth
InceptionJan 26, 2011Oct 9, 2025

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.

VXUS vs WQTM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

VXUS vs WQTM Performance

Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund ETF (WQTM) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year VXUS returned +22.28% while WQTM returned +5.48%. Year to date, VXUS is up 14.48% versus a gain of 19.33% for WQTM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VXUS charges 0.05% per year while WQTM charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $45 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VXUS currently yields 2.51% against 0.00% for WQTM.

Holdings Overlap

WQTM already in VXUS17.2%

At least 17.2% of WQTM's money is in holdings VXUS also owns.

Stated as a floor: for VXUS, our book for it covers 87.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

WQTM and VXUS share little of their money.

8 positions in common, counted across the 8,091 positions we hold weights for in VXUS and 46 in WQTM, against full books of 8,747 and 47.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in VXUSWeight in WQTMDifference
ASML:ASAsml Holding N.V.1.70%1.85%0.15%
6702:JPFujitsu Ltd0.07%3.32%3.25%
6701:JPNec Corp Common Stock0.07%2.89%2.82%
9432:JPNippon Telegraph & Telephone Corp. Com Stk0.05%2.56%2.51%
DTE:FFDeutsche Telekom AG Deutsche Telekom Agnamens Aktien O N0.21%2.40%2.19%
017670:KRSk Telecom Co., Ltd.0.00%2.10%2.10%
NOKIA:FINokia Oyj0.15%1.47%1.32%
SESG:LUSes0.01%0.62%0.61%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of VXUS and WQTM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

VXUSWQTM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VXUS or WQTM?

VXUS has an expense ratio of 0.05% while WQTM charges 0.45%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, VXUS or WQTM?

Over the past year VXUS returned +22.28% vs +5.48% for WQTM, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between VXUS and WQTM?

At least 17.2% of WQTM's money is in holdings VXUS also owns. Our book for VXUS is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 8,091 positions we hold weights for in VXUS and 46 in WQTM.

Which pays a higher dividend, VXUS or WQTM?

VXUS yields 2.51% while WQTM yields 0.00%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is WQTM better than VXUS?

VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.