VXUS vs XMPT
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF vs VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VXUS | XMPT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 1.97% | |
| AUM | $156.5B | $223M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.60% | 6.18% | |
| Holdings | 8,747 | 40 | |
| YTD Return | +14.07% | -1.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.24% | +5.74% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.27% | +5.71% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +9.14% | -2.43% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 42.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -39.9% | -56.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | VanEck | |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2011 | Jul 12, 2011 |
VXUS vs XMPT Performance
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and VanEck CEF Municipal Income ETF (XMPT) is a ETF from VanEck. Over the past year VXUS returned +27.24% while XMPT returned +5.74%. Year to date, VXUS is up 14.07% versus a loss of 1.07% for XMPT.
Over three years, VXUS compounded at +19.27% per year against +5.71% for XMPT; over five years the annualized figures are +9.14% and -2.43% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs +3.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XMPT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 42.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.9% for VXUS and -56.3% for XMPT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.03. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VXUS charges 0.05% per year while XMPT charges 1.97%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $197 annually, a gap of $192 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VXUS currently yields 2.60% against 6.18% for XMPT.
Holdings Overlap
VXUS and XMPT share 0 holdings out of 7899 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VXUS or XMPT?
VXUS has an expense ratio of 0.05% while XMPT charges 1.97%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $192 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VXUS or XMPT?
Over the past year VXUS returned +27.24% vs +5.74% for XMPT, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), VXUS annualized +4.83% vs +3.83% for XMPT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VXUS or XMPT?
XMPT has been the more volatile fund at 42.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: VXUS -39.9% vs XMPT -56.3%.
Should I hold both VXUS and XMPT?
VXUS and XMPT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.03, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VXUS and XMPT?
VXUS and XMPT share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7899 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VXUS or XMPT?
VXUS yields 2.60% while XMPT yields 6.18%, so XMPT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.