VYM vs XSW
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | XSW | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $81.6B | $516M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.24% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 616 | 134 | |
| YTD Return | +16.42% | +9.03% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.22% | +9.37% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.03% | +15.15% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.21% | +3.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 20.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -45.4% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Sep 28, 2011 |
VYM vs XSW Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF (XSW) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year VYM returned +24.22% while XSW returned +9.37%. Year to date, VYM is up 16.42% versus a gain of 9.03% for XSW.
Over three years, VYM compounded at +19.03% per year against +15.15% for XSW; over five years the annualized figures are +12.21% and +3.36% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, XSW has the edge at +15.82% annualized vs +7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XSW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for VYM and -45.4% for XSW. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while XSW charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $35 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.24% against 0.00% for XSW.
Holdings Overlap
VYM and XSW share 7 holdings out of 728 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or XSW?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while XSW charges 0.35%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $31 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VYM or XSW?
Over the past year VYM returned +24.22% vs +9.37% for XSW, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), VYM annualized +7.10% vs +15.82% for XSW. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VYM or XSW?
XSW has been the more volatile fund at 20.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: VYM -58.8% vs XSW -45.4%.
Should I hold both VYM and XSW?
VYM and XSW have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VYM and XSW?
VYM and XSW share 7 common holdings with a 1.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 728 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or XSW?
VYM yields 2.24% while XSW yields 0.00%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.