VYM vs ZMAR
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF vs Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VYM | ZMAR | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.04% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $81.6B | $114M | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.24% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 616 | 7 | |
| YTD Return | +15.34% | +3.56% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.24% | +6.42% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.22% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.21% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.6% | 1.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -58.8% | -2.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Innovator ETFs Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Nov 10, 2006 | Mar 3, 2025 |
VYM vs ZMAR Performance
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year VYM returned +23.24% while ZMAR returned +6.42%. Year to date, VYM is up 15.34% versus a gain of 3.56% for ZMAR.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 1.8% for ZMAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -58.8% for VYM and -2.3% for ZMAR. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VYM charges 0.04% per year while ZMAR charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $4 vs $79 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VYM currently yields 2.24% against 0.00% for ZMAR.
Holdings Overlap
VYM and ZMAR share 0 holdings out of 604 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VYM or ZMAR?
VYM has an expense ratio of 0.04% while ZMAR charges 0.79%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VYM or ZMAR?
Over the past year VYM returned +23.24% vs +6.42% for ZMAR, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), VYM annualized +7.04% vs +6.60% for ZMAR. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VYM or ZMAR?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 1.8% for ZMAR. Worst drawdown: VYM -58.8% vs ZMAR -2.3%.
Should I hold both VYM and ZMAR?
VYM and ZMAR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VYM and ZMAR?
VYM and ZMAR share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 604 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VYM or ZMAR?
VYM yields 2.24% while ZMAR yields 0.00%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.