FFLV vs TYLG
vs
FFLV vs TYLG
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. FFLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. FFLV offers more diversification with 127 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $16M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 132 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2024-02-09 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +3.54% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +6.77% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +20.71% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 66 | - |
| Momentum Score | 79 | - |
| Value Score | - | - |
Holdings Overlap
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FFLV or TYLG?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while TYLG charges 0.60%. FFLV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FFLV and TYLG hold the same stocks?
FFLV and TYLG share 7 common holdings with a 3.4% weight overlap. They hold 191 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FFLV or TYLG?
Over the past year, FFLV returned +20.71% while TYLG returned +15.55%. FFLV outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.