FFLV vs TYLG
vs
FFLV vs TYLG
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF vs Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
vs
✓All holdings
✓Overlap Analysis
✓ETF Screener
✓Compare ETFs
Quick Verdict
FFLV has a lower expense ratio. FFLV delivered stronger 1-year returns. FFLV offers more diversification with 132 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FFLV | TYLG |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Global X by mirae Asset |
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.60% |
| AUM | $16M | $12M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.49% | 8.55% |
| Holdings Count | 132 | 74 |
| Inception Date | 2024-02-09 | 2022-11-21 |
| Investment Style | Large Cap Value | Option Writing |
| 1-Month Return | +3.54% | -0.50% |
| YTD Return | +6.77% | -0.71% |
| 1-Year Return | +20.71% | +15.55% |
| 3-Year Return | - | +22.29% |
| 5-Year Return | - | - |
| 10-Year Return | - | - |
| Buy Score | 66 | 59 |
| Momentum Score | 79 | 29 |
| Value Score | - | 65 |
Holdings Overlap
0.0%
Weight Overlap
0
Shared Holdings
0
Total Unique
Sector Allocation
Loading chart...
Frequently Asked Questions
Which has lower fees, FFLV or TYLG?
FFLV has an expense ratio of 0.38% while TYLG charges 0.60%. FFLV is the cheaper option, saving you money on management fees over time.
Do FFLV and TYLG hold the same stocks?
FFLV and TYLG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. They hold 0 unique securities combined. The moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Which performed better, FFLV or TYLG?
Over the past year, FFLV returned +20.71% while TYLG returned +15.55%. FFLV outperformed over this period. Past performance does not guarantee future results.