ACII vs PBFB
Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF vs PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - February
Which is better, ACII or PBFB?
PBFB has been ahead.
PBFB has a lower expense ratio. PBFB led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACII | PBFB |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.50%Best |
| AUM | $135M | $41M |
| Dividend Yield | 7.60% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 18 | 14 |
| YTD Return | +7.25% | +7.93%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.60% | +10.78%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.7%Best | 4.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -2.3%Best | -3.8% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $10,907 | $11,066Best |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Option Writing | Option Writing |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2025 | Feb 1, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 25, 2025 to Oct 12, 2026 (1 years).
ACII vs PBFB growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
ACII vs PBFB Performance
Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year ACII returned +10.60% while PBFB returned +10.78%. Year to date, ACII is up 7.25% versus a gain of 7.93% for PBFB.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PBFB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 4.9% compared with 3.7% for ACII. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -2.3% for ACII and -3.8% for PBFB. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACII charges 0.79% per year while PBFB charges 0.50%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $50 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACII currently yields 7.60% against 0.00% for PBFB.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACII and PBFB you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACII or PBFB?
ACII has an expense ratio of 0.79% while PBFB charges 0.50%. PBFB is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACII or PBFB?
Over the past year ACII returned +10.60% vs +10.78% for PBFB, so PBFB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), ACII annualized +9.07% vs +10.66% for PBFB. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACII or PBFB?
PBFB has been the more volatile fund at 4.9% annualized versus 3.7% for ACII. Worst drawdown: ACII -2.3% vs PBFB -3.8%.
Should I hold both ACII and PBFB?
ACII and PBFB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACII or PBFB?
ACII yields 7.60% while PBFB yields 0.00%, so ACII currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PBFB better than ACII?
PBFB has a lower expense ratio. PBFB led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.