ACII vs IVV
Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ACII or IVV?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACII | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $130M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 7.60% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 6 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +7.05% | +12.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.30% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 3.8%Best | 13.3% |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 24, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACII vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACII vs IVV Performance
Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ACII returned +9.30% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, ACII is up 7.05% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 3.8% for ACII. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACII charges 0.79% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $3 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACII currently yields 7.60% against 1.06% for IVV.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACII and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACII or IVV?
ACII has an expense ratio of 0.79% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACII or IVV?
Over the past year ACII returned +9.30% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACII or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 3.8% for ACII.
Should I hold both ACII and IVV?
ACII and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACII or IVV?
ACII yields 7.60% while IVV yields 1.06%, so ACII currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ACII?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.