ACIN vs EASG
Hartford Alpha Capture International Equity ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF
Which is better, ACIN or EASG?
EASG has been ahead.
EASG has a lower expense ratio. EASG led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIN | EASG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.14%Best |
| AUM | $558M | $68M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.75% |
| Holdings | 421 | 361 |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 16.2% |
| Max Drawdown | - | -32.3% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | Xtrackers ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2008 | Sep 5, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 63 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. ACIN has data through Nov 13, 2026 and EASG through Sep 11, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIN charges 0.52% per year while EASG charges 0.14%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $14 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIN currently yields 0.00% against 3.75% for EASG.
Holdings Overlap
At least 39.5% of EASG's money is in holdings ACIN also owns.
Stated as a floor: for ACIN, our book for it covers 87.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
81 positions in common, counted across the 409 positions we hold weights for in ACIN and 356 in EASG, against full books of 421 and 361.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIN | Weight in EASG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASAsml Holding Nv | 2.09% | 5.68% | 3.59% |
| SCHN:PASchneider Electric Se | 1.47% | 1.64% | 0.17% |
| HSBA:LNHsbc Holdings Plc | 0.05% | 3.05% | 3.00% |
| AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC | 0.85% | 2.10% | 1.25% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag Ordinary Shares | 0.32% | 2.43% | 2.11% |
| CBA:AUCommonwealth Bank of Australia | 0.35% | 1.67% | 1.32% |
| 8035:JPTokyo Electron Ltd | 0.06% | 1.35% | 1.29% |
| IBE:MAIberdrola Sa Common | 0.14% | 1.26% | 1.12% |
| 6098:JPRecruit Holdings Co Ltd | 0.06% | 1.30% | 1.24% |
| 6758:JPSony Corp | 0.06% | 1.27% | 1.21% |
39.5% of EASG is already inside ACIN.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIN or EASG?
ACIN has an expense ratio of 0.52% while EASG charges 0.14%. EASG is the cheaper option, by $38 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between ACIN and EASG?
At least 39.5% of EASG's money is in holdings ACIN also owns. Our book for ACIN is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 81 positions in common, counted across the 409 positions we hold weights for in ACIN and 356 in EASG.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIN or EASG?
ACIN yields 0.00% while EASG yields 3.75%, so EASG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is EASG better than ACIN?
EASG has a lower expense ratio. EASG led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.