ACIN vs NTSI
Hartford Alpha Capture International Equity ETF vs WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund
Which is better, ACIN or NTSI?
ACIN has been ahead.
NTSI has a lower expense ratio. ACIN led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIN | NTSI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.28%Best |
| AUM | $558M | $486M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.11% |
| Holdings | 421 | 926 |
| YTD Return | +1.44% | +6.17%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +9.09% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +5.36% |
| Fund Family | Hartford Funds | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2008 | May 20, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACIN vs NTSI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACIN vs NTSI Performance
Hartford Alpha Capture International Equity ETF (ACIN) is an ETF from Hartford Funds and WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Year to date, ACIN is up 1.44% versus a gain of 6.17% for NTSI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIN charges 0.52% per year while NTSI charges 0.28%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $28 annually, a gap of $24 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIN currently yields 0.00% against 3.11% for NTSI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 409 holdings in ACIN and 439 in NTSI, totalling 87.0% and 87.5% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 122 positions appear in both.
122 positions in common, counted across the 409 positions we hold weights for in ACIN and 439 in NTSI, against full books of 421 and 926.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIN | Weight in NTSI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASAsml Holding N.V. | 2.09% | 2.85% | 0.76% |
| SHEL:LNShell plc | 0.85% | 1.74% | 0.89% |
| UBSG:SMUbs Group Ag Ordinary Shares | 1.15% | 0.77% | 0.38% |
| AZN:LNAstrazeneca Plc | 0.85% | 1.06% | 0.21% |
| 6857:JPAdvantest Corp | 0.98% | 0.88% | 0.10% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag Ordinary Shares | 0.32% | 1.50% | 1.18% |
| UCG:MIUnicredit Spa | 0.96% | 0.75% | 0.21% |
| NESN:SMNestle Sa | 0.38% | 1.23% | 0.85% |
| TTE:PATotal Energies Se | 0.54% | 1.05% | 0.51% |
| HSBA:LNHsbc Holdings Plc | 0.05% | 1.50% | 1.45% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ACIN and NTSI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIN or NTSI?
ACIN has an expense ratio of 0.52% while NTSI charges 0.28%. NTSI is the cheaper option, by $24 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIN or NTSI?
ACIN yields 0.00% while NTSI yields 3.11%, so NTSI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NTSI better than ACIN?
NTSI has a lower expense ratio. ACIN led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.