NTSI vs VXUS
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, NTSI or VXUS?
Nearly the same fund. VXUS costs less.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NTSI | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.26% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $499M | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.43% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 466 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +8.16% | +13.64%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.29% | +20.82%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.71% | +19.58%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.75% | +9.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 14.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.0% | -29.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $13,225 | $15,485Best |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 20, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 20, 2021 to Sep 17, 2026 (5.3 years).
NTSI vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.3 years both funds cover.
NTSI vs VXUS Performance
WisdomTree International Efficient Core Fund (NTSI) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year NTSI returned +14.29% while VXUS returned +20.82%. Year to date, NTSI is up 8.16% versus a gain of 13.64% for VXUS.
Over three years, NTSI compounded at +15.71% per year against +19.58% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +5.75% and +9.14% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NTSI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 14.8% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.0% for NTSI and -29.4% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NTSI charges 0.26% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $26 vs $5 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NTSI currently yields 3.43% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 442 holdings in NTSI and 8,082 in VXUS, totalling 89.4% and 88.8% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 302 positions appear in both.
302 positions in common, counted across the 442 positions we hold weights for in NTSI and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 466 and 8,747.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in NTSI | Weight in VXUS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASAsml Holding Nv | 3.00% | 1.42% | 1.58% |
| HSBA:LNHsbc Securities Inc | 1.80% | 0.82% | 0.98% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag – Class N | 1.47% | 0.65% | 0.82% |
| SHELShell Plc | 1.51% | 0.57% | 0.94% |
| ROP:SMRoche Ps Par Ag | 1.30% | 0.69% | 0.61% |
| NESN:SMNestle Sa | 1.14% | 0.58% | 0.56% |
| SIE:SGSiemens Ag Reg Common Stock | 1.05% | 0.54% | 0.51% |
| AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC | 0.90% | 0.57% | 0.33% |
| FP:PATotal Se | 1.00% | 0.38% | 0.62% |
| CBA:AUCommonwealth Bank Of Australia | 0.85% | 0.47% | 0.38% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NTSI and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NTSI or VXUS?
NTSI has an expense ratio of 0.26% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, NTSI or VXUS?
Over the past year NTSI returned +14.29% vs +20.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, NTSI or VXUS?
NTSI has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 14.8% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: NTSI -34.0% vs VXUS -29.4%.
Should I hold both NTSI and VXUS?
NTSI and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NTSI or VXUS?
NTSI yields 3.43% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so NTSI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than NTSI?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.