ACIO vs NTSX
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF vs WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund
Which is better, ACIO or NTSX?
Each has led over a different period.
NTSX has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over 5Y, NTSX over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACIO | NTSX |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79% | 0.20%Best |
| AUM | $2.4B | $1.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 1.07% |
| Holdings | 524 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +9.08% | +9.70%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.87% | +12.12%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.26% | +20.58%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.31%Best | +9.01% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.0%Best | 16.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -14.9%Best | -31.3% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,333Best | $15,393 |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | WisdomTree Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 9, 2019 | Aug 2, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 10, 2019 to Oct 12, 2026 (7.3 years).
ACIO vs NTSX growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.3 years both funds cover.
ACIO vs NTSX Performance
Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF (ACIO) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and WisdomTree US Efficient Core Fund (NTSX) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments. Over the past year ACIO returned +9.87% while NTSX returned +12.12%. Year to date, ACIO is up 9.08% versus a gain of 9.70% for NTSX.
Over three years, ACIO compounded at +16.26% per year against +20.58% for NTSX; over five years the annualized figures are +10.31% and +9.01% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, NTSX has the edge at +12.20% annualized vs +9.80%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
NTSX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 10.0% for ACIO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -14.9% for ACIO and -31.3% for NTSX. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACIO charges 0.79% per year while NTSX charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $20 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACIO currently yields 0.37% against 1.07% for NTSX.
Holdings Overlap
At least 93.1% of ACIO's money is in holdings NTSX also owns.
Stated as a floor: for NTSX, our book for it covers 90.8% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of ACIO is already inside NTSX. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
159 positions in common, counted across the 165 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 501 in NTSX, against full books of 524 and 506.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACIO | Weight in NTSX | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.77% | 7.11% | 0.66% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.43% | 6.82% | 0.61% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.75% | 5.07% | 0.68% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.79% | 3.53% | 0.26% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.49% | 2.06% | 0.43% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.23% | 2.23% | 0.00% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.77% | 1.28% | 0.49% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.63% | 1.35% | 0.28% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 1.55% | 1.43% | 0.12% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.47% | 1.49% | 0.02% |
93.1% of ACIO is already inside NTSX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACIO or NTSX?
ACIO has an expense ratio of 0.79% while NTSX charges 0.20%. NTSX is the cheaper option, by $59 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACIO or NTSX?
Over the past year ACIO returned +9.87% vs +12.12% for NTSX, so NTSX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), ACIO annualized +9.80% vs +12.20% for NTSX. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ACIO or NTSX?
NTSX has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 10.0% for ACIO. Worst drawdown: ACIO -14.9% vs NTSX -31.3%.
Should I hold both ACIO and NTSX?
ACIO and NTSX have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACIO and NTSX?
At least 93.1% of ACIO's money is in holdings NTSX also owns. Our book for NTSX is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 159 positions in common, counted across the 165 positions we hold weights for in ACIO and 501 in NTSX.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACIO or NTSX?
ACIO yields 0.37% while NTSX yields 1.07%, so NTSX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is NTSX better than ACIO?
NTSX has a lower expense ratio. ACIO led over 5Y, NTSX over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.