ACSG vs VTI
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ACSG or VTI?
Small Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ACSG led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ACSG | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $51M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 303 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +15.09%Best | +12.57% |
| 1Y Return | +17.61%Best | +17.22% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Fund Family | American Century ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 14, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
ACSG vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
ACSG vs VTI Performance
American Century Small Cap Growth Insights ETF (ACSG) is an ETF from American Century ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ACSG returned +17.61% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, ACSG is up 15.09% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ACSG charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ACSG currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 71.1% of ACSG's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of ACSG is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 49 days apart, ACSG as of Aug 18, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
202 positions in common, counted across the 291 positions we hold weights for in ACSG and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 303 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ACSG | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| KRYSKrystal Biotech Inc | 0.98% | 0.01% | 0.97% |
| CECOCeco Enviromental Com | 0.97% | 0.00% | 0.97% |
| TXG10x Genomics Inc | 0.96% | 0.00% | 0.96% |
| HXLHexcel Corp | 0.86% | 0.01% | 0.85% |
| QLYSQualys Inc | 0.82% | 0.00% | 0.82% |
| XPROExpro Group Holdings NV | 0.81% | 0.00% | 0.81% |
| SXTSensient Technologies Corp | 0.80% | 0.00% | 0.80% |
| PLXSPlexus Corp | 0.79% | 0.01% | 0.78% |
| AIRAar Corp | 0.78% | 0.00% | 0.78% |
| ESEEsco Technologies Inc | 0.75% | 0.01% | 0.74% |
71.1% of ACSG is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ACSG or VTI?
ACSG has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ACSG or VTI?
Over the past year ACSG returned +17.61% vs +17.22% for VTI, so ACSG leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ACSG and VTI?
At least 71.1% of ACSG's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 202 positions in common, counted across the 291 positions we hold weights for in ACSG and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ACSG or VTI?
ACSG yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ACSG?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ACSG led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.