ADME vs DVDN
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF vs Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF
Which is better, ADME or DVDN?
ADME has been ahead.
ADME has a lower expense ratio. ADME led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ADME | DVDN |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.79%Best | 1.65% |
| AUM | $299M | $3M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.36% | 15.98% |
| Holdings | 345 | 16 |
| YTD Return | +8.96%Best | -28.19% |
| 1Y Return | +7.90%Best | -29.74% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.19%Best | -11.16% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +6.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.5%Best | 15.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.7%Best | -45.1% |
| $10,000 over 3 years | $15,910Best | $7,081 |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.6%Best | 63.2% |
| Fund Family | Aptus ETFs | Kingsbarn Capital Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 8, 2016 | Mar 17, 2023 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 2, 2023 to Nov 11, 2026 (3 years).
ADME vs DVDN growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3 years both funds cover.
ADME vs DVDN Performance
Aptus Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (ADME) is an ETF from Aptus ETFs and Kingsbarn Dividend Opportunity ETF (DVDN) is an ETF from Kingsbarn Capital Management. Over the past year ADME returned +7.90% while DVDN returned -29.74%. Year to date, ADME is up 8.96% versus a loss of 28.19% for DVDN.
Over three years, ADME compounded at +16.19% per year against -11.16% for DVDN.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DVDN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 10.5% for ADME. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.7% for ADME and -45.1% for DVDN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ADME charges 0.79% per year while DVDN charges 1.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $79 vs $165 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ADME currently yields 0.36% against 15.98% for DVDN.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 166 holdings in ADME and 18 in DVDN, totalling 98.9% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 166 positions we hold weights for in ADME and 18 in DVDN, against full books of 345 and 16.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 166 and 18 positions we hold weights for.
ADME holds 166 positions DVDN does not, 98.9% of the fund.
Largest: NVDA 7.86%, AAPL 7.57%, MSFT 5.94%, GOOG 5.44%, AMZN 3.73%
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ADME and DVDN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ADME or DVDN?
ADME has an expense ratio of 0.79% while DVDN charges 1.65%. ADME is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ADME or DVDN?
Over the past year ADME returned +7.90% vs -29.74% for DVDN, so ADME leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ADME or DVDN?
DVDN has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 10.5% for ADME. Worst drawdown: ADME -15.7% vs DVDN -45.1%.
Should I hold both ADME and DVDN?
ADME and DVDN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, ADME or DVDN?
ADME yields 0.36% while DVDN yields 15.98%, so DVDN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is DVDN better than ADME?
ADME has a lower expense ratio. ADME led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. ADME is less concentrated, with 40.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.