AESR vs QQQ
Anfield US Equity Sector Rotation ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. AESR delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AESR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $258M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +17.15% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.30% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.43% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.56% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Horizon Funds | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2019 | Mar 10, 1999 |
AESR vs QQQ Performance
Anfield US Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) is a ETF from Horizon Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year AESR returned +27.30% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, AESR is up 17.15% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, AESR compounded at +25.43% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +13.56% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AESR has the edge at +16.00% annualized vs +13.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.8% for AESR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.1% for AESR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AESR charges 0.97% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $18 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AESR currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AESR or QQQ?
AESR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $79 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AESR or QQQ?
Over the past year AESR returned +27.30% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so AESR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AESR annualized +16.00% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AESR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.8% for AESR. Worst drawdown: AESR -31.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both AESR and QQQ?
AESR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between AESR and QQQ?
AESR and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 131 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AESR or QQQ?
AESR yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.