AESR vs VTI
Anfield US Equity Sector Rotation ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, AESR or VTI?
Nearly the same fund. VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AESR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 84.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AESR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $248M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 32 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +15.31%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +18.24%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.72%Best | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.79%Best | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.7% | 17.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -31.1%Best | -35.0% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,077Best | $17,908 |
| Top 10 Weight | 84.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Horizon Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 17, 2019 to Sep 18, 2026 (6.8 years).
AESR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.8 years both funds cover.
AESR vs VTI Performance
Anfield US Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) is an ETF from Horizon Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year AESR returned +18.24% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, AESR is up 15.31% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, AESR compounded at +24.72% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +13.79% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AESR has the edge at +15.53% annualized vs +14.48%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AESR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.7% compared with 17.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.1% for AESR and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AESR charges 0.97% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $3 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AESR currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
11.9% of AESR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.4% of VTI's money is in holdings AESR also owns.
AESR and VTI share little of their money.
17 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in AESR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 32 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,135 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for AESR (96.1% of the fund), and 13 for AESR that do not appear in VTI (86.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in AESR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 0.64% | 0.52% | 0.12% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 0.80% | 0.11% | 0.69% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 0.82% | 0.08% | 0.74% |
| CSXCsx Corp. | 0.76% | 0.13% | 0.63% |
| DARDarling Ingredients, Inc. | 0.86% | 0.01% | 0.85% |
| KEYSKeysight Technologies Inc. | 0.76% | 0.08% | 0.68% |
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 0.70% | 0.14% | 0.56% |
| MSGSMadison Square Garden Co/the | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.77% |
| LFUSLittelfuse Inc | 0.75% | 0.02% | 0.73% |
| FIXComfort Systems USA Inc. | 0.67% | 0.08% | 0.59% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of AESR and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AESR or VTI?
AESR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $94 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, AESR or VTI?
Over the past year AESR returned +18.24% vs +16.08% for VTI, so AESR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AESR annualized +15.53% vs +14.48% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, AESR or VTI?
AESR has been the more volatile fund at 17.7% annualized versus 17.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: AESR -31.1% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both AESR and VTI?
AESR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between AESR and VTI?
11.9% of AESR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.4% of VTI's is in holdings AESR also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 32 positions we hold weights for in AESR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, AESR or VTI?
AESR yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than AESR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. AESR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 84.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.