AESR vs IVV
Anfield US Equity Sector Rotation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. AESR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | AESR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $258M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 32 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +16.24% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +25.65% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.00% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.53% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.1% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Horizon Funds | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
AESR vs IVV Performance
Anfield US Equity Sector Rotation ETF (AESR) is a ETF from Horizon Funds and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year AESR returned +25.65% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, AESR is up 16.24% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, AESR compounded at +25.00% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +13.53% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, AESR has the edge at +15.87% annualized vs +6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
AESR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.1% for AESR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
AESR charges 0.97% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $3 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, AESR currently yields 0.00% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
AESR and IVV share 10 holdings out of 526 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, AESR or IVV?
AESR has an expense ratio of 0.97% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $94 per year of difference.
Which performed better, AESR or IVV?
Over the past year AESR returned +25.65% vs +20.94% for IVV, so AESR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), AESR annualized +15.87% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, AESR or IVV?
AESR has been the more volatile fund at 17.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: AESR -31.1% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both AESR and IVV?
AESR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between AESR and IVV?
AESR and IVV share 10 common holdings with a 1.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 526 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, AESR or IVV?
AESR yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.